U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

SUMMARY CONTEMPT MAY PROPERLY BE APPLIED TO THE ORDERLY REFUSAL OF WITNESSES TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL AFTER GRANT OF IMMUNITY - UNITED STATES V WILSON

NCJ Number
31661
Journal
American Criminal Law Review Volume: 13 Issue: 2 Dated: (FALL 1975) Pages: 271-283
Author(s)
R L WYLD
Date Published
1975
Length
13 pages
Annotation
THE DEVELOPMENT OF AND LIMITATIONS TO THE COURTS' POWER TO HOLD WITNESSES SUMMARILY IN CONTEMPT IS TRACED AND THE EFFECTS OF A RECENT DECISION ON THESE LIMITATIONS ARE DISCUSSED.
Abstract
THIS DECISION (US V. WILSON) REPRESENTS A DEPARTURE FROM THE HISTORICAL TREND TOWARD NARROWING THE SCOPE OF A COURT'S SUMMARY POWER TO PUNISH OR IMPRISON WITHOUT DUE PROCESS. THE GRANT OF IMMUNITY BY A COURT TO A WITNESS IS REGARDED AS THE REMOVAL OF HIS RATIONALE FOR SILENCE. IF HE STILL REFUSES TO SPEAK, HE IS THEN CONSIDERED TO BE IMPEDING THE PROGRESS OF THE COURT AND CAN BE SUMMARILY CITED FOR CONTEMPT.