THE COURT HELD THAT, EVEN THOUGH CHILEAN COOPERATION GAVE RISE TO A SUSPICION OF UNITED STATES INVOLVEMENT IN THE BRUTAL INTERROGATION AND ABDUCTION, THERE WAS NO SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE UPON WHICH TO BASE A DENIAL OF JURISDICTION. THIS DECISION, WHICH IS THE SECOND CIRCUIT'S MOST RECENT PRONOUNCEMENT OF BODY EXCLUSION, REVIVES AND RECASTS THE TIME-WORN KER-FRISBIE DOCTRINE: 'FORCIBLE ABDUCTION IS NO SUFFICIENT REASON WHY THE PARTY SHOULD NOT ANSWER WHEN BROUGHT WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT WHICH HAS THE RIGHT TO TRY HIM'. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT)