U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

REVIEWING SENTENCING DISCRETION - A METHOD OF SWIFT APPELLATE ACTION

NCJ Number
34028
Journal
UCLA Law Review Volume: 23 Issue: 3 Dated: (FEBRUARY 1976) Pages: 491-500
Author(s)
J D HOPKINS
Date Published
1976
Length
10 pages
Annotation
APPELLATE DELAY IN CASES INVOLVING SENTENCING DISPARITY IS DISCUSSED AND THE APPROACH USED BY THE NEW YORK INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURTS TO ALLEVIATE THAT DELAY IS DESCRIBED.
Abstract
THE NEW INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE PROVIDES THAT THE MOTION PAPERS, RECORD, AND PRESENTENCE REPORT ARE SUBMITTED TO A FIVE JUDGE PANEL WITHOUT ARGUMENT. THE APPEAL IS ASSIGNED TO ONE OF THE JUDGES WHO PREPARES AND CIRCULATES A REPORT TO OTHER PANEL MEMBERS WITHIN A WEEK WITH A VOTING SLIP ATTACHED. IF ALL FIVE MEMBERS AGREE WITH THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION, THE DECISION IS HANDED DOWN WITHIN A WEEK. IF NOT, THE APPEAL IS PLACED ON THE NEXT CONSULTATION CALENDAR TO BE DISCUSSED AND DETERMINED AND A DECISION HANDED DOWN WITHIN THAT WEEK. THE AUTHOR CONCLUDES THAT THE PROCEDURES APPEAR TO BE WORKING WELL AND ARE AN IMPROVEMENT OVER USUAL APPELLATE HANDLING OF SENTENCING REVIEW CASES.