IT IS NOT AN EXAMINATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORRECTIONAL LAW OR MODERN CORRECTIONS IN GENERAL, BUT AN ANALYSIS OF HOW THE CASE AFFECTED THE INSTITUTION WITH WHICH IT WAS CONCERNED, THE JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA, PRISON. MORE PARTICULARLY, THE STUDY DETAILS THE PROCESS BY WHICH THE HOLLAND DECISION, A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION INVOLVING DISCIPLINE, MEDICAL CARE, GENERAL CONDITIONS, OVERCROWDING, AND RACIAL SEGREGATION, WAS IMPLEMENTED AND THE FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCED THAT PROCESS. ALSO COVERED ARE THE ROLES OF THE VARIOUS PERSONS AND INSTITUTIONS INVOLVED, THE EXTENT TO WHICH COMPLIANCE WAS ACHIEVED, AND THE OVERALL OUTCOME OF THE LITIGATION. STUDIES OF THREE OTHER CASES ARE AVAILABLE AS NCJ# 40776-40778. IN NCJ# 40775, THE FINDINGS FROM THE INDIVIDUAL STUDIES ARE PRESENTED IN AN INTEGRATED FASHION, TOGETHER WITH GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT OF LITIGATION REGARDING CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES. THIS STUDY IS UNIQUE IN THAT NO SIMILAR EFFORT HAS BEEN UNDERTAKEN TO EXAMINE COMPARATIVELY WHAT HAPPENS AFTER CORRECTIONAL LAW CASES ARE DECIDED. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT)...MSP