U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM MANUAL, V 7 - TRAFFIC COURTS

NCJ Number
46134
Author(s)
ANON
Date Published
1974
Length
41 pages
Annotation
A TRAFFIC COURT GUIDELINE MANUAL DESIGNED TO FACILITATE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN EFFECTIVE TRAFFIC COURT SYSTEM THROUGHOUT THE STATES IN COMPLIANCE WITH HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM 7 IS PRESENTED.
Abstract
IT IS THE GENERAL POLICY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THAT STATE RECORDS RELATING TO CONVICTIONS, FORFEITURES OF BAIL, OR ANY EQUIVALENT ACTION BE PART OF THE STATE CENTRAL TRAFFIC RECORD, PARTICULARLY THE DRIVER RECORDS. THIS WILL REQUIRE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A UNIFIED STATEWIDE SYSTEM OF AUTHORITY, SUPERVISION, AND ADMINISTRATION OF ALL COURTS TRYING TRAFFIC CASES, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFIED POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND PROGRAMS BASED ON A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF TRAFFIC COURTS. A COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC COURT PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING: JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPERVISION, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION, UNIFORM RULES OF TRAFFIC COURT PROCEDURES, COURT FACILITIES, PERSONNEL SELECTION AND AVAILABILITY, MANUALS AND GUIDES, MANDATORY APPEARANCE, CERTIFICATION OF PRIOR PENALTIES, RANGE OF AVAILABLE PENALTIES, REPORTING OF MOVING TRAFFIC CONVICTIONS AND JUDICIAL STATISTICS, TRAFFIC COURT FINANCES, JUDICIAL EDUCATION, AND UNIFORM PENALTIES. IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH A PROGRAM MAY REQUIRE CONSTITUTIONAL REVISION, LEGISLATIVE ACTION, OR PROMULGATION OF COURT RULES. ADDITIONAL PLANS, IF NECESSARY, SHOULD BE FORMULATED TO ENSURE PROMPT AND IMPARTIAL PROCEEDINGS FOR ALLEGED OFFENDERS. ANNUAL PROGRAM EVALUATION IS ESSENTIAL TO DETERMINE FULFILLMENT OF PROGRAM OBJECTIVES AND TO IDENTIFY PROGRAM NEEDS. A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE INVENTORY OF ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROGRAM AND ITS COMPONENT PARTS IS RECOMMENDED. INITIAL AND SUBSEQUENT ANNUAL EVALUATIONS SHOULD PROVIDE A BASIS FOR A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROGRESS TOWARD REACHING PROGRAM GOALS. FURTHER, MEANINGFUL PROGRAM INFORMATION MUST INCLUDE STATUS REPORTS ON THE TRAFFIC COURTS AND THE PROGRAM EVALUATION, AND A COMPREHENSIVE REPORT TO THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION. SUCCESSFUL PLANNING WILL ALSO REQUIRE PARTICIPATION BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES, A LOCAL TRAFFIC COURTS STUDY, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL COURT PLANS. APPENDIXES INCLUDE HIGHWAY SAFETY STANDARD 7, A BRIEF BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH ABSTRACTS, AND A LISTING OF MODEL PROJECTS AND RESOURCE ORGANIZATIONS. (JAP)