U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

LEGAL RESPONSES TO CHILD ABUSE

NCJ Number
50942
Journal
Family Law Quarterly Volume: 12 Issue: 1 Dated: (SPRING 1978) Pages: 1-36
Author(s)
B M DICKENS
Date Published
1978
Length
36 pages
Annotation
LEGAL PRINCIPLES AND PROBLEMS ARISING IN STRUCTURING AND OPERATING FAMILY INTERVENTION UPON EVIDENCE OF CHILD ABUSE OR NEGLECT ARE DISCUSSED, AND SOME RECOMMENDATIONS ARE PRESENTED.
Abstract
CHILD ABUSE LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, AND ENGLAND ARE DISCUSSED. LEGAL DEFINITIONS OF CHILD ABUSE AND CHILDREN IN NEED OF CARE CONSIDER THE PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL, AND MENTAL HEALTH OF MINORS, RESULTING IN INTERLOCKED SCHEMES OF COMPULSORY REPORTING, INSTITUTIONAL INTERVENTION, AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. THERE IS A LACK OF UNIVERSALITY AND CLARITY IN OFFICIAL REGULATIONS DEFINING CHILD ABUSE AND DESCRIBING PERSONS TRAINED TO IDENTIFY THE CRIME. CHILD ABUSE SHOULD BE OBJECTIVELY ASSESSED THROUGH INDIVIDUAL CONDITIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RATHER THAN THROUGH AN ARBITRARY DETERMINATION OF PARENTAL IMMORALITY. PROFESSIONALS SUCH AS PHYSICIANS, SOCIAL WORKERS, AND TEACHERS ARE IN A POSITION TO IDENTIFY ABUSE, AND IT IS REALISTIC TO DEVELOP LEGAL SCHEMES FOR CONTROLLING CHILD ABUSE THAT ARE ADDRESSED TO THESE SEGMENTS. JUDICIAL OPINION PERMITS INTERVENTION WHEN A REASONABLE APPREHENSION OF ABUSE EXISTS; HOWEVER, A STRONGER STANDARD OF PROOF MAY BE REQUIRED. LEGISLATIVE ISSUES REGARDING REPORTING CONCERN WHO SHOULD HAVE REPORTING DUTIES, WHETHER OR NOT THE DUTIES SHOULD BE LEGAL, WHO SHOULD BE REPORTED, AND WHAT RIGHTS SHOULD BE ACKNOWLEDGED FOR THOSE REPORTED. A FORMULA MIGHT BE PROVIDED MAKING COMPULSORY REPORTING APPLICABLE TO ANY PERSON WHO HAS CAUSE TO SUSPECT CHILD ABUSE DURING THE COURSE OF PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES, AND MINOR FINES MIGHT BE ISSUED FOR FAILURE TO REPORT. SELF-REPORTING SHOULD NOT BE DETERRED BY PENAL CONSEQUENCES. THE VARIETIES OF CHILD ABUSE AFFORD CONSIDERABLE CHOICE AS TO CLASSIFICATION AND PENAL RESPONSE TO THE CRIME. PUNISHMENT OF OFFENDERS IS NOT ALWAYS COMPATIBLE WITH THE VICTIMS' BEST INTEREST IF THE OFFENDER AND VICTIM SHARE A CONTINUING RELATIONSHIP, NOR IS INCARCERATION SUITABLE FOR IMPROVING A CHILD ABUSER'S PARENTING SKILLS. LEVELS OF JUDICIAL PROTECTION INCLUDE OFFICIAL SUPERVISION OF THE CHILD, TEMPORARY REMOVAL OF THE CHILD FROM THE HOME, AND PERMANENT REMOVAL. THE CONFLICT BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND CHILD PROTECTION IN CHILD ABUSE TRIALS IS NOTED. THERE ARE OFTEN NO WITNESSES AND THE JURY MUST JUDGE ON CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. THERE IS ALSO CONFUSION ABOUT THE FUNCTION OF THE CHILD'S COUNSEL. A TREND TOWARD CENTRALIZED RECORDKEEPING OF ABUSE CASES CREATES A CLASH BETWEEN INFORMATION PRIVACY AND THE INFORMATION NEED SPURRED BY NEW TEAM TREATMENT METHODS. FINALLY, THE ROLE OF PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS IS DISCUSSED AND THEIR POSSIBLE CONFLICT WITH POLICE SERVICES IS CONSIDERED. REFERENCES ARE FOOTNOTED. (DAG)