U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

SOME COMMENTS ON COMPARATIVE METHODOLOGIES IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE

NCJ Number
50957
Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY AND PENOLOGY Volume: 6 Issue: 3 Dated: (AUGUST 1978) Pages: 233-245
Author(s)
D L BLAZICEK; G M JANEKSELA
Date Published
1978
Length
13 pages
Annotation
THE DIFFICULTY IN DEVELOPING A COMPARATIVE APPROACH TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE IS ILLUSTRATED TO EMPHASIZE UNIVERSAL PROBLEMS IN CONDUCTING RESEARCH TRANSNATIONALLY AND TO INDICATE ITS IMPORTANCE FOR THEORY DEVELOPMENT.
Abstract
THERE IS NO DISTINCTIVE COMPARATIVE METHOD IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH; RATHER, THERE IS AMBIGUITY, CONFUSION, AND MISUSE OF THE TERM 'COMPARATIVE.' THE EXISTING BODY OF KNOWLEDGE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE IS SCATTERED AND NOT WELL DEFINED, AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES CAN BE CONSIDERED COMPARATIVE ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY EMPLOY ILLUSTRATIVE MATERIALS FROM A VARIETY OF COUNTRIES. COMPARATIVE EFFORTS ARE DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF THE PROBLEMS IN DOING CROSS-CULTURAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, SUCH AS LANGUAGE DIFFICULTIES AND TRANSLATION, DEFINING RESEARCH UNITS, DATA COLLECTION, CODING AND PROCESSING, AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES. BECAUSE THE KEY TO THEORY CONSTRUCTION LIES IN THE QUEST FOR UNIVERSAL STANDARDS, KNOWLEDGE OBTAINED IN COMPARATIVE STUDIES SHOULD PERFORM THE FOLLOWING FUNCTIONS: (1) ORGANIZE AND CATEGORIZE ITEMS IN A TYPOLOGY, (2) PREDICT FUTURE EVENTS, (3) EXPLAIN PAST EVENTS, (4) PROVIDE UNDERSTANDING ABOUT WHAT CAUSES EVENTS, AND (5) PROVIDE A POTENTIAL FOR CONTROLLING EVENTS. COMPARATIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH SHOULD SEEK TO DEVELOP THEORIES CHARACTERIZED BY ABSTRACTNESS, INTERSUBJECTIVITY, AND EMPIRICAL RELEVANCE. HOWEVER, THE QUESTION AS TO HOW SUCH A FORMIDABLE TASK CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED STILL REMAINS. EXISTING STRATEGIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BODY OF KNOWLEDGE IN COMPARATIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE UNDERSCORE THE QUESTION WHETHER RESEARCHERS SHOULD BEGIN WITH RESEARCH THAT LEADS TO THEORY DEVELOPMENT, OR WITH THEORIES TO BE TESTED BY EMPIRICAL EFFORTS. THE STATE OF EXISTING COMPARATIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH RULES OUT THE FORMER, WHILE SUPPORTING THE LATTER STRATEGY (THEORY-THEN-RESEARCH), WHICH HAS AS ITS MAJOR FOCUS THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN EXPLICIT THEORY THROUGH WHICH A CONTINUOUS INTERACTION BETWEEN THEORY CONSTRUCTION AND EMPIRICAL RESEARCH RESULTS. NOTES AND REFERENCES ARE PROVIDED. (KBL)

Downloads

No download available

Availability