TOPICS DISCUSSED IN THE INTERVIEW CONCERN MORAL AND ETHICAL PROBLEMS IN EVALUATION, THE EVALUATION OF ACTUAL PROGRAM EFFECTS AGAINST A PROFILE OF DEMONSTRATED NEEDS FOR PROGRAM EFFORT (THE DEFINITION OF GOAL-FREE EVALUATION), GOAL-FREE EVALUATION IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION, METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF GOAL-FREE EVALUATION, DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ROLE OF THE GOAL-FREE EVALUATOR AND THE ROLE OF THE GOAL-BASED EVALUATOR, NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND THE FEASIBILITY OF GOAL-FREE EVALUATION, ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF EVALUATION, SOURCES OF BIAS ASSOCIATED WITH EVALUATION TECHNIQUES, THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN GOAL-FREE EVALUATION AND CLASSIC EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS AND PROCEDURES, PROBLEMS IN EVALUATING, RETROSPECTIVE OR IN-PROCESS EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS, THE PEER REVIEW PANEL FORM OF EVALUATION, CONSUMER-ORIENTED EVALUATION, AND CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH GOAL-FREE EVALUATION MAY NOT BE APPLICABLE. (DEP)