U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

JUDICIAL INTERVENTION IN CORRECTIONS - A CASE STUDY

NCJ Number
52112
Journal
Federal Probation Volume: 42 Issue: 3 Dated: (SEPTEMBER 1978) Pages: 10-17
Author(s)
R L SCHUSTER; S A WIDMER
Date Published
1978
Length
8 pages
Annotation
A BRIEF HISTORY OF JUDICIAL INTERVENTION IN CORRECTIONS IS PRESENTED, FOLLOWED BY A DISCUSSION OF THE GENERAL EFFECTS OF SUCH INTERVENTION AND A CASE STUDY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A SPECIFIC INTERVENTION DECISION.
Abstract
JUDICIAL INTERVENTION IN CORRECTIONS BY FEDERAL COURTS IS TRACED IN ITS EVOLUTION FROM A 'HANDS-OFF' POLICY TO ONE OF INTERVENTION IN INSTANCES OF BLATANT VIOLATION OF INMATES' CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. IT IS NOTED, HOWEVER, THAT THE STATED INTENTS OF COURT DECISIONS RARELY, IF EVER, ARE TRANSLATED INTO THE KIND OF PRACTICAL CHANGE INTENDED BY THE RULING JUDGE. WHEREAS SOME OBSERVERS OF THIS CONDITION CHARGE THAT CORRECTIONS ADMINISTRATORS ACTING 'IN BAD FAITH' TO CIRCUMVENT COURT DECISIONS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT THE DECISIONS, THIS ARTICLE MAINTAINS THAT BUREAUCRATIC DECISIONMAKING AND PROCEDURES ARE MORE OFTEN THAN NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR A WEAK OR INACCURATE TRANSLATION INTO ACTION OF COURT DECISIONS. THIS VIEW IS SUPPORTED IN AN EXAMINATION OF THE 1976 DECISION IN JAMES V. WALLACE, WHERE THE PRESIDING JUDGE CITED 11 ASPECTS OF PRISON CONDITIONS IN ALABAMA STATE PRISONS THAT SHOULD BE CHANGED. THE JUDGE ALSO ESTABLISHED A HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION TO MONITOR COMPLIANCE. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COURT ORDER HAVING TO DO WITH CLASSIFICATION OF INMATES IS EXAMINED. THIS SEGMENT OF THE COURT ORDER WAS UNDERTAKEN BY A GROUP CALLED THE PRISON CLASSIFICATION PROJECT. THE AUTHOR'S EXPERIENCE IN THIS PROJECT PROVIDES THE DATA FOR THE CASE STUDY. THE PROCEDURE DEVELOPED FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF INMATES IS DESCRIBED, AND IT IS INDICATED THAT A MAJOR PROBLEM LAY IN INTERPRETING THE COURT POLICY STATEMENT ON PRISONER CLASSIFICATION. AS THE POLICY IS PASSED THROUGH SEVERAL LEVELS OF HIERARCHY, ACTION IS BASED ON POLICY INTERPRETATION AT THAT LEVEL. IN THE CLASSIFICATION PROJECT, INTERPRETATION INEVITABLY OCCURRED AT SUCCEEDING LEVELS OF THE CORRECTIONAL HIERARCHY DOWN TO THE PRISON MONITOR WHO INTERVIEWS INMATES. THE INVOLVEMENT OF MULTITUDES OF PERSONNEL ACTING TO REINTERPRET OR RESIST IN VARYING DEGREES THE ORIGINAL POLICY IS SEEN TO INFLUENCE ITS PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION AT THE PRISON LEVEL. THIS ' SLIPPAGE' IS ILLUSTRATED IN SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CLASSIFICATION POLICY. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE BEST OF POLICIES CAN ONLY BE REALIZED IN PRACTICE THROUGH BETTER KNOWLEDGE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CONTINGENCIES AND CONSTRAINTS. A BILIOGRAPHY IS INCLUDED. (RCB)