skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 56178 Find in a Library
Title: ON THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF VOICE IDENTIFICATION
Author(s): ANON
Corporate Author: National Acad of Sciences
Publicity Director
United States of America

National Research Council
United States of America
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 161
Sponsoring Agency: National Acad of Sciences
Washington, DC 20418
National Research Council
Washington, DC 20001
Sale Source: National Acad of Sciences
Publicity Director
2101 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20418
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: THIS DISCUSSION PRESENTS THE TECHNOLOGICAL, LEGAL, AND SCIENTIFIC ASPECTS OF VOICE IDENTIFICATION AS PRACTICED AT PRESENT (1979) AND AS IT MIGHT BE IMPROVED IN THE FUTURE.
Abstract: IN TODAY'S PRACTICE, AN EXAMINER LISTENS TO RECORDED VOICE SOUNDS AND LOOKS AT VOICEGRAMS, WHICH GRAPHICALLY REPRESENT CERTAIN FEATURES OF VOICE SOUNDS, IN AN EFFORT TO MATCH VOICE SAMPLES FROM AN UNIDENTIFIED PERSON WITH THOSE OF ONE OR MORE IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS. BECAUSE TECHNOLOGY USED IN TRANSMITTING, RECORDING, REPRODUCING, AND ANALYZING SOUND WAS DEVELOPED FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN VOICE IDENTIFICATION, PRESENT PRACTICE IS BASED ON LIMITED KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE PROPERTIES OF VOICE SOUNDS AND ANALYSIS IS CONDUCTED LARGELY AS AN EMPIRICAL ART IN WHICH THE EXAMINER ACQUIRES SKILL THROUGH EXTENSIVE TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN PHONETICS AND ACOUSTICS HAS PRODUCED CONSIDERABLE INFORMATION ABOUT SPEECH SOUNDS AS RELATED TO THE SPEECH MESSAGE BUT RELATIVELY LITTLE INFORMATION ABOUT THE SOUNDS AS RELATED TO THE IDENTITY OF THE SPEAKER. THE PRACTICE OF VOICE IDENTIFICATION RESTS ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT INTRASPEAKER VARIABILITY IS LESS THAN OR DIFFERENT FROM INTERSPEAKER VARIABILITY. HOWEVER, THIS ASSUMPTION IS NOT WIDELY SUPPORTED BY SCIENTIFIC DATA, AND THEORY AND AVAILABLE VIEWPOINTS ABOUT PROBABLE ERRORS IN IDENTIFICATION DECISION RESULT MAINLY FROM VARIOUS PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENTS AND FRAGMENTARY EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS RATHER THAN FROM OBJECTIVE DATA REPRESENTATIVE OF FORENSIC APPLICATIONS. TO SOME EXTENT, THE VARIOUS LEGAL VIEWPOINTS REFLECT THIS TECHNICAL UNCERTAINTY. ALTHOUGH THE FIRST TESTIMONY ON VOICE IDENTIFICATION BY THE AURAL-VISUAL METHOD APPEARED IN A 1966 COURT CASE, NO MORE THAN 100 SUBSEQUENT CASES HAVE ARISEN. THE TECHNICAL UNCERTAINTIES CONCERNING THE PRACTICE OF VOICE IDENTIFICATION ARE SO GREAT THAT FORENSIC APPLICATIONS SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE APPROACHED WITH MUCH CAUTION. GRAPHIC DATA AND REFERENCES ARE INCLUDED. (KBL)
Index Term(s): Critiques; Techniques; Voice identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=56178

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.