U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

DISCRETION, DETERMINATE SENTENCING AND THE ILLINOIS PRISONER REVIEW BOARD - A SHOTGUN WEDDING

NCJ Number
63528
Author(s)
P BIGMAN
Date Published
1979
Length
70 pages
Annotation
THE REPORT EXAMINES THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ILLINOIS PRISONER REVIEW BOARD AND DISCUSSES EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY, ADULT PAROLE RELEASE, MANDATORY SUPERVISED RELEASE, PAROLE REVOCATION, AND OTHER ISSUES.
Abstract
THE ILLINOIS PRISONER REVIEW BOARD REPLACED THE ILLINOIS PAROLE AND PARDON BOARD WHEN ILLINOIS INSTITUTED DETERMINATE SENTENCING AND ABOLISHED PAROLE RELEASE IN 1978. AN INDEPENDENT STATE AGENCY, THE PRISONER REVIEW BOARD IS APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR WITH THE CONSENT OF THE STATE SENATE. BOARD MEMBERS, WHO SERVE FOR A 6-YEAR PERIOD, MUST HAVE AT LEAST 5 YEARS OF APPROPRIATE EXPERIENCE. THE BOARD HAS SEVERAL FUNCTIONS, INCLUDING AN INVESTIGATORY AND ADVISORY ROLE IN CLEMENCY PROCEEDINGS. IT ALSO HAS TWO MAJOR FUNCTIONS CONNECTED WITH PLACING PRISONERS ON MANDATORY SUPERVISED RELEASE: (1) PRISONERS SENTENCED TO AN INDETERMINATE SENTENCE CARRYING A MINIMUM TERM OF LESS THAN 20 YEARS UNDER THE OLD LAW ARE OFFERED THE OPTION OF ACCEPTING A DETERMINATE SENTENCE WITH A SET RELEASE DATE AND (2) THE BOARD SETS THE CONDITIONS OF MANDATORY SUPERVISED RELEASE. THE ABOLITION OF DISCRETIONARY PAROLE IS PREMISED ON A BELIEF THAT THE LENGTH OF A PRISONER'S INCARCERATION SHOULD BE BASED UPON THE NATURE OF THE OFFENSE COMMITTED AND SUBSEQUENT INSTITUTIONAL BEHAVIOR, AND NOT UPON A JUDGMENT THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IS 'READY' FOR RELEASE. RELEASE IS SEEN AS AN EARNED RIGHT RATHER THAN A GRANTED PRIVILEGE. MANDATORY SUPERVISED RELEASE IS ESSENTIALLY PAROLE SUPERVISION WITHOUT PAROLE RELEASE AND REPRESENTS AN ABRIDGMENT OF THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF DETERMINATE SENTENCING. PAROLE REVOCATION HEARINGS MAY RESULT FROM COMMISSION BY A PAROLEE OF EITHER A NEW CRIMINAL OFFENSE OR A TECHNICAL VIOLATION OF THE TERMS OF PAROLE. IN CASES INVOLVING A NEW OFFENSE, PAROLE IS ALMOST ALWAYS REVOKED, WHEREAS THE REVOCATION RATE FOR TECHNICAL VIOLATORS IS SUBSTANTIALLY LOWER (ABOUT 71 PERCENT). RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BOTH LONG-TERM AND INTERIM REFORMS ARE ENUMERATED FOR THE FOLLOWING AREAS: REVOCATION OF GOOD CONDUCT CREDITS AND GOOD TIME, MANDATORY SUPERVISED RELEASE AND DISCRETIONARY PAROLE RELEASE, INFORMATION FOR PRISONERS, STRUCTURE OF THE PRISONER REVIEW BOARD, AND THE FUTURE OF THE PRISONER REVIEW BOARD. CHARTS, FOOTNOTES, AND FIVE APPENDIXES (HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE, BASIS FOR DENYING PAROLE, MEMORANDUM, CONDITIONS OF PAROLE OR MANDATORY SUPERVISED RELEASE, AND MEANS OF EFFECTING RECOMMENDATIONS) ARE PROVIDED.

Downloads

No download available

Availability