U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL - A MANUAL FOR LAWYERS, JUDGES AND LEGISLATORS (FROM SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1979 - HEARINGS, 1979 - SEE NCJ-64636)

NCJ Number
64642
Author(s)
N S SOLOMON
Date Published
1979
Length
31 pages
Annotation
THIS MANUAL IS INTENDED TO MAKE ATTORNEYS AWARE OF THE NEED TO PROTECT A DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL.
Abstract
DISCUSSION IS BUILT ON THE THREE PURPOSES OF GUARANTEEING THE RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL: TO PROTECT ACCUSED PERSONS AGAINST EXTENDED IMPRISONMENT BEFORE TRIAL, TO RELIEVE A DEFENDANT'S ANXIETY AND PUBLIC SUSPICION RESULTING FROM AN UNTRIED ACCUSATION OF CRIME, AND TO ASSURE ACCUSED PERSONS THEY WILL BE TRIED WHILE WITNESSES ARE AVAILABLE AND THEIR MEMORIES ARE ACCURATE. EXAMINATION OF CASE LAW DERIVES FROM EXPERIENCE WITH THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT OF 1974, WHICH APPLIES DIRECTLY ONLY TO FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS; IF ACCUSED PERSONS ARE NOT BROUGHT TO TRIAL WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER ARREST, THIS ACT REQUIRES THE DISMISSAL OF CHARGES. TWO BASIC PREMISES ARE SUPPORTED IN REVIEWING THE CASE LAW: (1) FEDERAL LAW SUPERSEDES STATE LAW IN LEGAL CONFLICTS AND (2) THE RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL IS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING WHETHER A DELAY VIOLATES THAT FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT ARE ALSO NOTED, SUCH AS LENGTH OF DELAY, REASON FOR DELAY, AND WHETHER A DEFENDANT DEMANDED A SPEEDY TRIAL. FINALLY, VARIOUS SPEEDY TRIAL LAWS ARE COMPARED. (DEP)