ALTHOUGH THE PUBLIC IS GREATLY CONCERNED ABOUT CRIME, ITS CAUSES, AND PREVENTION, CRIME RESEARCH PAYS LITTLE ATTENTION TO THE PUBLIC'S VIEWS OR HOW THEY GET THEM. ACCORDINGLY, 4 PANELS OF 48 REGISTERED VOTERS FROM DIFFERENT AMERICAN CITIES WERE INTERVIEWED ABOUT THEIR ATTITUDES TOWARD CRIME AND QUESTIONED ABOUT VARIOUS KINDS OF NEWSPAPER AND TELEVISION CRIME. MEDIA STORIES PRESENTED A MIXTURE OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EVALUATIONS OF COURTS, CORRECTIONS, AND POLICE AND COURTS AND CORRECTIONS FARED WORST. THE STORIES GENERALLY IMPLIED THAT CRIMINAL SENTENCES ARE TOO LIGHT AND CRIME TRENDS ARE WORSENING. AMONG THE CITIZENS INTERVIEWED, HOWEVER, MOST USED PERSONAL EXPERIENCE RATHER THAN THE MEDIA TO EVALUATE PUBLIC CRIME FIGHTING. MOST JUDGED MEDIA CRIME COVERAGE ACCURATE, ALTHOUGH OVER HALF CLAIMED TO PAY LITTLE ATTENTION TO IT. FIFTY-SEVEN PERCENT OF THE INTERVIEWEES GAVE THE POLICE A GOOD RATING, BUT 65 PERCENT RATED THE CORRECTION SYSTEM POORLY, AS UNABLE TO PREVENT RECIDIVISM, LACKING DIRECTION, AND HAVING BAD FACILITIES; 42 PERCENT GAVE THE COURT SYSTEM A POOR EVALUATION. THE MOST COMMON OBJECTIONS ABOUT COURTS CONCERNED LAXNESS WITH CRIMINALS, LENGTHY TRIALS, AND CORRUPTION. MOST INTERVIEWEES BLAMED FAULTS ON CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND THE CONTROL OF POLICE, COURTS, OR CORRECTIONS, BUT IT IS CLAIMED THAT ONLY MAJOR CHANGES IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM WILL IMPROVE PUBLIC TRUST. NOTES ARE INCLUDED. (PAP)