THE DADE COUNTY PROCEDURE SPECIFIED THAT VICTIMS' VIEWS WERE TO HAVE THE MOST WEIGHT ON THE ISSUE OF THE APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION OR RESTITUTION FOR LOSSES OR INJURIES SUSTAINED AS A RESULT OF A DEFENDANT'S ACTION. THEY WERE TO HAVE ONLY LIMITED IMPORTANCE IN THE JUDGE'S CONSIDERATION OF THE LARGER SOCIAL ENDS TO BE SERVED BY SENTENCE. THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL FOR SYSTEMATIC INVOLVEMENT OF VICTIMS IN THE PROCESS WAS MET BY PREDICTIONS THAT VICTIMS WOULD DISRUPT THE PROCESS, WOULD MISUNDERSTAND THE DISCUSSIONS AND ACCUSE THE JUDGE AND ATTORNEYS OF AN UNSAVORY DEAL, AND WOULD BE VENGEFUL AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO REACH A JUST SETTLEMENT. BECAUSE OF THE RELATIVELY LOW ATTENDANCE BY VICTIMS, THE SESSIONS' IMPACT IS DIFFICULT TO ASSESS. HOWEVER, NONE OF THE PREDICTIONS WERE BORNE OUT BY THE DADE COUNTY EXPERIMENT; SETTLEMENT RATE REMAINED THE SAME, AND THE EFFECT ON SENTENCING, IF ANY, WAS TOWARD A REDUCTION IN SENTENCE SEVERITY AND USE OF INCARCERATION. THE REDUCTION OF TIME FROM ARRAIGNMENT TO DISPOSITION SUGGESTED THAT THE PRETRIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE MAY REPRESENT A SUBSTANTIAL BENEFIT IN TERMS OF COST. NEVERTHELESS PROFESSIONAL ATTITUDES TOWARD THE CONFERENCE WERE MIXED. THE CONFERENCE'S POSITIVE IMPACT ON LAY AND POLICE PARTICIPATION WAS LIMITED. COSTS INVOLVED IN NOTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS WERE ONE IDENTIFIABLE BURDEN. YET, TRADITIONAL PLEABARGAINING HAS BEEN SECRETIVE, EXCLUSIVE AND FORMAL. THE PRETRIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WHILE BEING MORE OPEN, INCLUSIVE, AND FORMAL, HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO IMPEDE CASE SETTLEMENTS. THE CONFERENCE, WITHOUT INCREASED COSTS, PROVIDES VICTIMS, DEFENDANTS, AND POLICE WITH IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE CRIMINAL CASE DISPOSITION PROCESS, AND THEREFORE, IS ADVANTAGEOUS TO A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY. REFERENCES ARE INCLUDED. (MHP)