U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

IMPLEMENTING AN EQUITABLE SENTENCING SYSTEM - THE UNIFORM LAW COMMISSIONERS' MODEL SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS ACT

NCJ Number
66774
Journal
Virginia Law Review Volume: 65 Issue: 7 Dated: (NOVEMBER 1979) Pages: 1175-1285
Author(s)
H S PERLMAN; C G STEBBINS
Date Published
1979
Length
111 pages
Annotation
THE MODEL SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS ACT PROVIDES FOR A SENTENCING PROCESS COMMITTED TO EQUITABLY ALLOCATING PENALTIES AMONG CRIMINAL OFFENDERS. IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS OF THIS SENTENCING REFORM ARE EXAMINED.
Abstract
THE MODEL SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS ACT, AS PROMULGATED BY THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS, IS A PROPOSAL THAT ENCOMPASSES THE FULL RANGE OF ISSUES, RECOGNIZING THAT SENTENCING POWER IS DISPERSED WIDELY TO NUMEROUS AGENCIES AND INDIVIDUALS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND THAT REFORM EFFORTS MUST EXTEND BEYOND THE COURTROOM OF THE SENTENCING JUDGE. FOR THIS REASON, THE SENTENCING REFORM POSSIBILITIES EVALUATED HERE ARE CONSIDERED IN RELATION TO SPECIFIC LEVELS OF SENTENCING POWER IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. THE LEGISLATURE'S ROLE IN ESTABLISHING PARAMETERS OF DETERMINATE SENTENCING IS DISCUSSED FIRST, THE ANALYSIS ADDRESSING THE PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING AND THE NATURE AND SELECTION OF SENTENCING VARIABLES. IN ADDITION, SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES, CONCURRENT AND CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES, AND THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF STATUTORY SENTENCES ARE DISCUSSED. SECOND, THE PROPOSED SENTENCING COMMISSION'S ROLE IS EXPLAINED ON THE BASIS OF THE COMMISSION'S INTENDED PURPOSE--THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES IT IS EXPECTED TO CONSTRUCT. THIRD, THE COURT'S SENTENCING POWER IS ANALYZED THROUGH THE STUDY OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES, DEVIATION FROM APPELLATE REVIEW, AND SUSPENDED SENTENCES. FOURTH, SENTENCING POWER OF THE PAROLE BOARD IS ADDRESSED. THIS BODY IS DEEMED UNNECESSARY UNDER THE PROPOSED DETERMINATE SENTENCING SYSTEM. ITS PRESENT FUNCTIONS OF AFFECTING INMATE DISCIPLINE AND CONTROL, RELIEVING PRISON OVERCROWDING, AMELIORATING DISPARITY OF SENTENCING, AND PROVIDING COMPASSION ARE EVALUATED. FINALLY, THE SENTENCING POWERS OF THE PROSECUTORS AND THE CORRECTIONAL BUREAUCRACY ARE DISCUSSED. SENTENCING REFORM IS URGED ON AS WIDE A SCALE AS IS OUTLINED HERE; I.E., THROUGHOUT THE SYSTEM. FOOTNOTES AND SELECTED SENTENCING PROVISIONS ARE PROVIDED.