U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Sanctions Applicable to Corporate Persons in States of the European Community

NCJ Number
70685
Journal
Revue de droit penal et de criminologie Volume: 60 Issue: 3 Dated: (March 1980) Pages: 163-190
Author(s)
R Screvens
Date Published
1980
Length
28 pages
Annotation
Sanctions which can be applied to corporate entities in various European community countries are explored.
Abstract
While penal responsibility is recognized in some Common Market countries, e.g., Ireland, the Netherlands, Great Britain, and to a lesser extent Denmark, the majority of the countries, e.g., Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Italy, and West Germany do not currently apply such sanctions. The revised French criminal code adopts the principle of penal responsibility for groups of a commercial, financial, or industrial nature, and Belgium plans to follow suit. In many cases, however, individual responsibilities are linked to collective ones. Thus, the group may often be punished for the actions of its individual members. In general, sanctions against corporate entities take the form of community, administrative, or civil action rather than of repressive punishment or imprisonment, which is hardly possible for a group. Sanctions may be intended either to protect members of the group from internal management actions or to protect the community at large from the group. Such sanctions may only be imposed when an organization profits from an offense, or when the responsible individual cannot be identified. Possible penalties in Common Market countries include fines, which are the most common penalty; confiscation of goods, often accompanied by dissolution to put the company out of business; and injunctions against particular actions to end dangerous or irregular situations. Also applicable are security deposits for prevention, reparation of damages, revocation of certain market rights, professional suspensions, closing or supervision of the establishment, and negative publicity. Temporary disqualification of a corporate entity is rare, and warnings are ineffective. The question of how to deal with an organization when illegal practices have ceased and offending personnel have been removed prior to intervention remains unresolved. Notes are supplied.

Downloads

No download available

Availability