U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Crime Analysis Unit Survey (From Comprehensive Evaluation of Phase One of the Virginia Beach, Virginia Police Department's Integrated Criminal Apprehension Program, P 212-270, 1980, by Wolfgang Pindur et al - See NCJ-73102)

NCJ Number
73109
Author(s)
W Pindur; A Nadkarni; J Jones
Date Published
1980
Length
59 pages
Annotation
The full-time sworn officers of the Virginia Beach, Va., Police Department were surveyed to determine their perceptions about the department's Crime Analysis Unit (CAU) and to assess the flow, frequency, and level of communications between officers and CAU personnel.
Abstract
The questionnaire for uniformed officers contained 31 items; the one for investigative officers, 19 items. Two hundred and ten questionnaires were completed and returned. Almost all (98 percent) of the respondents rated the CAU's performance positively; 183 officers rated it as excellent or good. Similarly, most agreed that the CAU performs an important function in the department and were familiar with the types of information the CAU can provide. About three-fifths of the respondents made contact with the CAU or were contacted by crime analysts from one to five times a month. The CAU usually provided the requested information, but did not always respond soon enough to meet the requesting officers' needs. Almost all of the officers felt that it is important to prepare field interview cards on suspicious individuals and activities; these cards were submitted to the CAU more frequently than any other type of information. Most officers received the bulletins distributed by the CAU and felt that this information was useful. Officers in the Uniformed Division had more favorable attitudes toward the CAU than did officers in the other divisions. Officers in the Third Precinct were more positive toward the CAU than were the officers in the other two precincts. Tables and lists of actual responses are included. This survey is part of a larger evaluation of the department's Integrated Criminal Apprehension Program, which was designed to upgrade the patrol system, focus efforts on serious crimes and crimes committed by serious offenders, and increase citizen satisfaction with the department. (Author abstract modified)