U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Delay in Preliminary Investigation and Trial - A Study of Their Causes and Proposed Solutions

NCJ Number
74294
Journal
Criminal Justice Journal Volume: 1 Issue: 1 Dated: (First Quarter 1980) Pages: 42-46
Author(s)
C T Villanueva
Date Published
1980
Length
5 pages
Annotation
Findings from a study conducted by the Office of the President of the Philippines addressing delays in preliminary investigations and trials are discussed; proposed solutions are included.
Abstract
Survey findings supported the conclusion that backlogs and delays are the major constraints impeding the efficient administration of justice in the Philippines. It is suggested that this statement is true of other Asian countries and of the United States as well. Delays in preliMinary investigations are caused by the increase in the population, changes in the social and economic conditions of the people, and related factors such as the insufficent number of prosecutors to handle the large number of cases. Time involved in serving subpoenas to respondents and other witnesses adds to the delay. Proposals for remedying delays in pretrial investigations include increasing the number of crimes and the number of cases filed; divergent locations of the courts, necessitating extensive travel time for attorneys; judicial leniency in granting requests for postponement; deliberate absences or jumping bail by the accused; and time required for service of subpoenas and transcription of stenographic notes. It is suggested that more timely trials could be accomplished by increasing the number of branches of courts and filling existing vacancies, gathering all court branches in one central location, and enforcing the requirement that judges hold sessions for 5 hours per day. Other possible measures include enforcing legal requirements for granting postponements, applying new constitutional provisions regarding deliberate absences of the accused, and considering the depenalization or decriminalization of certain offenses. Six footnotes are included.

Downloads

No download available

Availability