U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Niches in Prison - Ameliorative Environments Within Maximum Security Correctional Institutions

NCJ Number
74426
Author(s)
J Seymour
Date Published
1980
Length
646 pages
Annotation
This two-part dissertation explores the relationship between the environmental concerns expressed by men in prison and the characteristics of prison subsettings that prisoners percieved as meeting such concerns.
Abstract
This relationship is termed 'niche.' Interviews were conducted with 312 prisoners concerning the attributes of prison settings. The results suggest that prisoners with different social, cultural, and personal histories express different environmental concerns in prison and that particular configurations of prison work, program, and special living assignments are likely to be reported as 'niches' by prisoners than are others. While some classes of settings are disproportionately reported as stressful or as settings which facilitate access to contraband or power, other settings stand out as ameliorative. A typing of these perceptions, including the personal (environmental concern) and setting (physical characteristics) components of each, was performed. In addition, prisoner perceptions of several typical and atypical formal ameliorative prison settings were explored. These included a protection company; an elderly and handicapped unit; a unit for young, white prisoners; and a special unit for the emotionally disturbed. Case portraits of these units include descriptions of the settings, categorizations and typing of the positive and negative features of the settings, and population profiles. The efficacy of such settings in resolving prison problems and trade-offs which occur when prisoners are placed in them are discussed. Finally, strategies for the reduction of prison stress are reviewed. Sample interview responses, data tables, and footnotes with references are provided. Appendixes contain interview coding instructions; subenvironment, random, and formal-niche interview schedules; and information on missing data and on variable coding and classification. (Author abstract modified.)