A violent juvenile offender is defined as a youth who is guilty of acts or threatened acts of violence against a person, combined with serious property offenses linked to repetitive criminal behavior of a less serious nature. While most criminal justice authorities agree that violence among juveniles is being reported at a higher rate than in the last decade, some attribute this rise to increased law enforcement efforts rather than real increases in violent behavior. No accurate techniques for predicting potentially dangerous behavior are available. Most studies emphasize personality factors such as motivation, internal inhibitors, and habit strength, but situational factors can facilitate or impede violence. Techniques commonly used to predict dangerousness are the clinical case study which gathers a broad range of information about a subject and the statistical method which assesses only facts related to criminal behavior. Both approaches tend to overclassify the violent offender and ignore the possibility of change through maturation or rehabilitation. One study concludes that past behavior is the best predictor of future violence, but that combined statistical and clinical methods improve prediction validity. Numerous researchers have linked specific variables to violent offenders, such as poor reading skills and low IQ, but these data have been relatively useless for predictions. Other studies indicate that the perception of dangerousness in another person reflects characteristics of the evaluator rather than the potential offender. In response to the apparent increase in juvenile crime, the public has demanded more severe treatment for the violent offender. Deinstitutionalization may result in the total occupation of traditional correctional institutions by violent juvenile offenders. Special programs developed for this group in Michigan, New York, Maine, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania are discussed. These facilities are distinguished primarily by their admission standards rather than innovative treatment or educational approaches. The review is based on 21 references. (Author abstract modified)