U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Longitudinal Study of the Judicial Role in Family and Commercial Disputes

NCJ Number
77816
Author(s)
J J Perlstein
Date Published
1981
Length
171 pages
Annotation
The objective of this study is to trace changes in the frequency of filings over an 80-year period in selected categories of cases in five State trial courts and to test two hypotheses about the nature of court activities.
Abstract
The first hypothesis tested in the study is that commercial and family litigation has recently lost its adversariness. Evidence of this transformation is the increase in uncontested judgments and petitions for relief. No-fault divorces and default judgments in the plaintiff's favor exemplify this trend. The second hypothesis is that the kinds of cases brought for judicial resolution increasingly depart from those that the courts have typically been best suited to handle. Examples of the new trend are cases enforcing children's rights within the family unit. Six time periods were chosen to measure the changes in the type and number of cases filed in five State courts: 1903-04, 1918-19, 1933-34, 1948-49, 1963-64, and 1976-77. Approximately 6,000 cases were sampled; this allowed roughly 200 cases to be examined for every period at each site. Trend analysis reveals that the composition of the civil caseload in the five trial courts of general jurisdiction has changed considerably over the past 80 years, but findings are mixed with regard to tested hypotheses. Some data show that much of the courts' work is becoming more routine, but there are other instances that indicate the dispute settlement function is not necessarily diminishing. It may be concluded that the filing or threat of filing a suit may induce settlement in some cases, and it is taking progressively longer to settle or dispose of these uncontested cases. Trials still constitute approximately the same proportion of all judgments as at the turn of the century, however. Routine administration of cases may be more frequent but it has not replaced the courts' function as dispute resolvers. Extensive tables, graphs, and footnotes are provided in the study. (Author summary modified)