U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Bellingham Street Academy Number 1480 - An Evaluation

NCJ Number
78115
Author(s)
S Readio
Date Published
1976
Length
29 pages
Annotation
This evaluation tested the impact of an alternative school, the Bellingham Street Academy in Washington State, by comparing recidivism rates of its students with those of a matched group of out-of-school juveniles from a neighboring jurisdiction.
Abstract
Between 1973 and 1976 the Bellingham Street Academy operated an academic and crafts program which was recognized by the Juvenile Court as a substitute for traditional schools. This report first describes the Academy's referral procedures, educational program, administration, and personnel. As the project evolved, most students were referred informally by other peers or parents rather than the courts. Students and staff worked out individualized programs of study, and the administrative structure was democratic, relying on regular student input. Attendance was monitored, but turnover rates for students as well as staff were high. A comparison group for the evaluation was selected from probation records in Skagit County using key characteristics such as race, school status, sex, and prior referrals for delinquency, alcohol, and drugs. A profile of the 151 juveniles who entered the Academy during its 3 years covers family backgrounds, referral sources, grade level, and type of program selected. In the original plan, each student was to complete a standardized achievement test upon admission, but little testing was actually done. Most students chose a general study program with noncredit courses and made little progress toward completing their high school education. An examination of the comparison group demonstrates that it was more delinquent than the Academy population. However, a final assessment based on recidivism rates found no significant differences in the proportions of juveniles from both groups who committed new juvenile and adult offenses. Further analysis showed that the Academy juveniles committed offenses more frequently than the comparison group. This particular model of alternative education was singularly ineffective, probably because of its very informal atmosphere, constant turnover of staff and students, and poor relations with schools and traditional social agencies. Statistical tables, a partial list of courses offered by the Academy, and 9 references are included.