U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Pomona Valley Juvenile Diversion Project - Final Evaluation Report for the Fourth Program Year, July 1, 1977 Through June 30, 1978

NCJ Number
78143
Author(s)
M W Lipsey; R J Coffin
Date Published
Unknown
Length
34 pages
Annotation
Significant events and evaluation findings are reported from the fourth year of the Pomona Valley Juvenile Diversion Project's (PVJDP) in California from July 1, 1977 through June 30, 1978.
Abstract
The year included significant events in the areas of program development, funding, and organizational changes. Most notable was the project's ability to continue without LEAA funding. The project relied on funds from participating cities, augmented by special purpose grants, largely under the Comprehensive Employment Training Act (CETA) program. In January 1978, PVJDP received a CETA grant for the development of four businesses designed to use juvenile diversion clients as employees and to provide them with career training. Each juvenile client works part-time in one of the four businesses of urban farming, recycling, motorcycle repair, and woodshop. In addition, the youths attend career training classes, where they are given general information relating to jobs and employment. The 864 referrals represented the largest number of clients served in any of the 4 project years. Data on 147 clients who were law enforcement referrals to PVJDP between July 1977 and January 1978 showed that at least 24 had recidivistic police contacts during the 6-month followup period. Since these records are incomplete, the best estimate is that recidivism was between 16 and 25 percent. The impacts on the juvenile arrest rates and the juvenile justice system are also discussed. Clients' referral reasons, offense histories, and personal and family characteristics are also reported. Policy recommendations are offered in the areas of costs, program emphasis, forms, and recordkeeping.