U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Public Opinion and Capital Punishment - A Close Examination of the Views of Abolitionists and Retentionists

NCJ Number
78163
Author(s)
P C Ellsworth; L Ross
Date Published
Unknown
Length
83 pages
Annotation
Attitudes toward capital punishment were surveyed in an attempt to understand the attitudes themselves -- their bases, function, and meaning for the people who hold them. Also explored were the general psychology of attitudes and beliefs and residents similarities and differences between attitudes toward capital punishment and those on other public policy matters.
Abstract
Following a review of the legal context for the attitude and the arguments concerning the relevance of public opinion for the definition of cruel and unusual punishment, the paper presents the research results. In 1974, 500 adult resident of 4 municipalities in the San Franciso Bay area were surveyed about their attitudes toward the death penalty. Results of the survey indicate that 58.8 percent of the respondents favored capital punishment, 30.8 percent were opposed, and 10.4 percent were undecided. The results from the 1973 nationwide Harris poll were almost identical to theses results. After exploring reasons for these attitudes and their psychological implications, the report concludes that public opinion polls that simply ask people whether or not they favor capital punishment are ineffective measures of public opinion. Because the Supreme Court is considering numerous alternatives to the capital punishment law, it will not find the simple opinion polls indicative of the amount of support for all alternatives defined as acceptable by the Court. Opinion poll data, however, can provide useful evidence on the nature and bases of attitudes toward capital punishment, provided that more specific questions are asked. Endnotes, about 35 references, a list of cases cited, and the survey instrument and results are appended.