The film includes interviews with witnesses, friends and relatives of the victim, attorneys, and various courtroom principals. The dominant spokesman for the police department is its attorney. At the inquest, the defendant refused under his fifth amendment rights to answer any relevant questions; no criminal charges were ever brought against him. Details about the incident are unclear, and accounts contradictory. While the victim's common-law wife talks about his affability, the police attorney depicts the dead man as a maniacal individual with bionic strength, allegedly influenced by drugs. The spirit of public disquiet about police brutality, unwarranted use of force, and coverup attempts is captured through scenes of street demonstrations demanding the officer's indictment and in statements by the victim's mother. Lending credence to the allegations leveled against the police is a former member of the force, who testifies to the violence-prone attitudes of police officers, and the introduction of an additional complaint of police use of deadly force.