The principal contention is that the only ingredients necessary for being a woman employed in a male institution also apply to male correctional workers; masculine traits are not necessary but professional traits are. Elizabeth I, Amelia Earhart, Indira Gandhi, Golda Meir, and Eleanor Roosevelt exemplify accomplished personalities who nevertheless contributed to the stereotype of an unattractive successful woman. Legislation and court action since the 1920's have culminated in the Equal Employment Opportunity Act which legally opened the door for women to obtain the type of employment they desire. Nevertheless, resistant male attitudes still root in myths about females' traits and social roles and are compounded by negative tactics of the women's rights movement. A 1978 survey of correctional institutions in 29 States found that only 2 percent of correctional officers were female. The trend is for increasing the number of women in the correctional workforce. The most difficult area for women to enter is the adult male institution. The rationale for keeping women out of this work cites the impropriety of the female presence in this setting, fear of public reaction, norms against exposure to male nudity, and expectations of female officers' lenience. Experience shows advantages in female officers' presence, which provides better morale, a feeling of normalcy, lessened tensions, and new images of women as professionals. Disadvantages include complications of privacy issues, security, and the sexual responses of deprived inmates. These can be overcome through women's commonsense measures, professional skill, and dedication to the chosen profession. Women officers in male institutions are advised to be themselves and not masquerade as men, never use their femininity as an excuse in meeting obligations of the work, but make the most of female characteristics that could enhance the humanness of correctional institutions. Five references are given.