skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 80905 Find in a Library
Title: Extradition in America - Of Uniform Acts and Governmental Discretion
Journal: Baylor Law Review  Volume:33  Issue:4  Dated:(Fall 1981)  Pages:793-841
Author(s): L W Abramson
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 49
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Examined are the current extradition process under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (UCEA) and the fundamental changes of the new Uniform Extradition and Rendition Act (UERA).
Abstract: The UCEA, now adopted by 48 States, permits extradition under circumstances and through procedures not articulated in the Federal statute. The Federal statute and the Constitution place an outer limit on extradition procedures, but States are free to use more relaxed standards, such as those in the UCEA. The extradition process under the UCEA is discussed under the topics of arrest in asylum State, preparation of papers in demanding, issuance of Governor's warrant in asylum State, bail after issuance of rendition warrant, and habeas corpus hearing in asylum State. At the habeas corpus hearing, it is advisable for the petitioner to introduce all documents and allied papers, so as to compel the court to examine their legal sufficiency. A defect in the supporting papers may rebut the prima facie case established by the Governor's rendition warrant. The facial validity of each document involved in extradition is examined. The Commissioners on Uniform State Laws recently adopted the UERA, designed to replace the UCEA. It expands the role of the judiciary and fills gaps in the UCEA, as well as purporting to provide added protections for the person sought. Other cognizable issues examined in relation to extradition are mental competency, constitutional and jurisdictional issues, and bail after habeas corpus proceedings. It is noted that despite references to the extradition process as a 'summary executive proceeding,' executive and judicial discretion pervade the process under the UCEA. The UERA purports to streamline extraditions by adoption and clarification of the de facto features of the current process. In the face of arguments that the UERA threatens to preempt the traditional role of State executives, its progress through State legislatures may have difficulty. A total of 245 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Extradition; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.