U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Training Course in the Analysis of Crime and the Criminal Justice System, Module 3 - Refining Crime Measures

NCJ Number
82348
Author(s)
R Hardt
Date Published
Unknown
Length
0 pages
Annotation
The use of crime indicators in data analysis and the difficulties posed by the variety of crime measures used and the different data collection techniques are examined.
Abstract
As a policy tool, crime indicators are useful in assessing the nature of a community's crime threat and the pressures on the system to handle cases. One of the principal sources of data for analysis is the Uniform Crime Summaries. However, major difficulties arise in the use of crime data, even if similar rules are applied in data collection. Differences may exist in techniques for counting victims or incidents, making comparisons impossible, and compound incidents or series of incidents are usually only counted in one category, leading to undercounting. Principal indicators for trend analysis can be defined as (1) crime volume, which may be measured as incidence (i.e., period counts) or as prevalence (i.e, point counts); (2) risk of crime, measured as a rate that varies with the method of calculation; and (3) harm from crime or seriousness of crime, which may be estimated through such factors as common loss value. Indexing systems have been established to ascertain the seriousness of offenses. The best known of these is the Wolfgang and Sellin System which considers hospitalization, financial loss, use of weapons, and forcible entry as crime seriousness measures. Another system describes seriousness as a function of convictions and sentence length for particular offenses. Moreover, harm units can be calculated for Index crimes to facilitate neighborhood comparisons. Planners in separate communities are encouraged to calculate seriousness scores according to criteria deemed appropriate for their own setting.

Downloads

No download available

Availability