One of the primary reasons for the inadequacy of Australian prison libraries is that State governments and correctional authorities are not convinced that prisoners need better library services. This attitude stems largely from disillusionment with efforts to rehabilitate prisoners. Appeals for improved libraries, therefore, must be geared to the value system within which the correctional system is currently operating. The primary values of correctional administration appear to be conformity to legal standards for prison operations and prison social control. Based on these values, appeals for improved prison libraries can argue that prisoners have the right of access to information of their choosing and that improved prison library services can reduce inmate boredom and idleness and increase the likelihood of adjustment to the community upon release. Another problem obstructing the development of a policy for improving prison libraries is States' failure to designate which agency is responsible for library services. Each State should determine the structure of responsibility most suitable to its particular organization and needs. One of the first tasks in improving inadequate prison libraries is to identify and consult with those involved in the operations of successful prison libraries. Valuable sources may include the correctional administrators, the institutional staff, State library authorities, local community libraries, prison education officers, and the inmates themselves. A total of 63 references are listed.