Despite an extensive public relations campaign in 1976, the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) encountered such strong public opposition to locating a reception center in Uxbridge, Ontario that it abandoned the project. A case study of the lengthy debate over this project revealed citizens were most concerned that the facility would endanger personal and public security. Residents also argued that the institution would offer few professional employment opportunities for locals, would not purchase supplies locally, could depress land values, and place extra burdens on public services. Citizens were suspicious of the municipal government which supported the proposal, the CSC, and the federal government. Data from a study of Warkworth Institution, built in the late 1960's near several Ontario communities, suggests that Uxbridge's fears about security were largely unfounded. The incidence of escapes, inmates unlawfully at large, and inmate perpetrated offenses at Warkworth was low. Complaints about the economic impact were realistic in some areas, since Warkworth provided only clerical and security jobs for locals and made few purchases locally. Land values were unaffected. Interviews indicated that members of the community were not upset by the institution's presence. This comparison suggests that the CSC is not marketing itself properly, particularly in providing objective information about the impact of a correctional facility on the host community. The paper provides two references.