It proposes instead, a look at statistical and morphological aspects of the problem and at the workings of criminal justice and child protection services. It finds labeling effects arising from inappropriately criminalized behaviors, from the discretionary practices of arrest and prosecution authorities, and the absence of diversion alternatives. Particularly in the cultural milieu of African communities, judges should not be making disposition decisions regarding status offenders and other less serious forms of juvenile deviance. A model is proposed, whereby child protection committees would function within their communities and, in coordination with medical and social assistance agencies, prescribe appropriate intervention measures in line with indigenous customs. A variety of measures should be available, including temporary placement with another branch of the extended family and individualized forms of community service, reparation, and restitution. A total of 39 footnotes are given.