U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Copping Out - Why Police Leave the Force (From Police at Work, P 107-124, 1983, Richard R Bennett, ed. - See NCJ-89673)

NCJ Number
89678
Author(s)
J R Sparger; D J Giacopassi
Date Published
1983
Length
18 pages
Annotation
A mail survey of 58 individuals who had voluntarily left the Memphis Police Department (Tennessee) between 1975 and 1980 showed that a major turning point leading to resignation was the feeling of stagnation in the job with little hope of future betterment, rather than dissatisfaction with the work itself.
Abstract
Of the respondents, 85 percent were white and 88 percent were male. They averaged 33.5 years in age, 6.9 years of service, and 15 years of education. Most had been patrol officers. Over 51 percent resigned because they believed they were stagnating in their jobs, with many blaming the promotion and evaluation process. The second most common turning point resulting in resignation was experiencing an intense situation that convinced the individual that he or she should leave the force. The 1978 Memphis police strike was the experience for four of the seven officers in this category. Approximately 10 percent left to seek a more fulfilling job, often reporting a sense of frustration that nothing was being accomplished. Only a small proportion of the respondents cited family considerations, unprofessional attitudes of coworkers, and official departmental policies as reasons for resigning. The least common turning point was new avenues of opportunity presenting themselves. Pay and fringe benefits were not paramount factors causing officers to quit, although respondents were dissatisfied with salary levels. New recruits to police work have greater abilities and expectations than persons entering the field a decade ago, but face more impediments to realizing their expectations. To retain these valuable employees, police administrators must develop valid and effective performance evaluations and promotion procedures as well as career development programs. The paper includes tables and 21 references.