Many courts allow such testimony to go to the jury because they find that hypnosis is a credibility problem, not one of admissibility. Other courts will allow hypnotically induced testimony, but only if detailed procedural safeguards are followed. Another group of courts, including the influential California tribunal, exclude the testimony per se. This article examines each of these views, but it concentrates on California. Lawyers and researchers need to go further than this extensively researched article on the question of hypnosis and the admissibility of witness testimony. (Publisher abstract)