U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Chicago Area Project Revisited

NCJ Number
91044
Journal
Crime and Delinquency Volume: 29 Issue: 3 Dated: (July 1983) Pages: 398-462
Author(s)
S Schlossman; M Sedlak
Date Published
1983
Length
65 pages
Annotation
This review of the Chicago Area Project (CAP), the pioneering, community-based delinquency prevention effort initiated by sociologists in the 1930's and 1940's, focuses on the Russell Square Community Committee (RSCC), the first and probably most successful of the committees organized by Clifford Shaw.
Abstract
Shaw and his colleagues had determined that several Chicago neighborhoods produced vastly disproportionate numbers of criminals and chose Russell Square, a working class, Polish-Catholic community, as the first locale to test their innovative ideas of community organization and delinquency prevention. After 15 months of work to gain community support, the CAP opened its St. Michael's Boys Club in January 1933. Youth gangs were active in Russell Square and involved in crime, but their crimes consisted mainly of petty larceny, vandalism, and lewdness. Unconventional and/or illegal sexual relations between boys and girls were common, disturbing the CAP workers who made upgrading relations between the sexes an integral part of their prevention efforts. The CAP's strategy consisted of recreational programs for youths, community revitalization, and mediation, notably one-to-one interaction between street workers and gang members and child advocacy with schools, police, and courts. Consistent with its philosophy of working with persistently difficult and delinquent youths, the CAP extended its program to parolees. A wide range of individuals, including some ardent supporters, sporadically criticized the CAP. Although evaluations have methodological problems and cannot prove the CAP reduced delinquency, two successful features are clear: its implementation conformed to several criteria that social scientists now consider essential to effective social innovation and the RSCC overcame many operational hurdles that bedevil most current innovative programs in delinquency prevention. Excerpts from the RSCC archival records and other CAP staff reports support the text.