U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Criminality in a Drug Treatment Sample - Measurement Issues and Initial Findings

NCJ Number
91993
Author(s)
J J Collins; R L Hubbard; J V Rachal; E R Cavanaugh; S G Craddock; P L Kristiansen
Date Published
1982
Length
101 pages
Annotation
This report addresses criminality indicators developed from Treatment Outcome Prospective Study (TOPS) data, a large multiscale study of clients in federally funded drug treatment programs from 1979 to 1981, with attention to their reliability, validity, and use in evaluating drug treatment effects.
Abstract
A discussion of measurement issues focuses on the incompleteness and possible bias of official crime records and the validity of self-report data. A literature review emphasizes research dealing with the drug-crime relationship or the effects of drug treatment on criminal behavior. The TOPS research collected data on arrests, self-reported offenses, convictions, incarcerations, and illegal income from respondents in pretreatment, intreatment, and posttreatment periods. A comparative analysis of self-reports of arrest with official records suggested TOPS self-report data were fairly accurate and complete. The report reviews the TOPS methodology and selected findings regarding participants' criminal behavior and involvement with the criminal justice system, noting that these clients were much more likely than the general population to report criminal behavior and contacts with police and courts. Of the 1979 cohort, 83 percent had been arrested at one time, and one-third were involved with the legal system when they entered treatment. This section also explores the issue of correcting crime estimates for time at risk. An analysis of demographic factors in the TOPS sample showed sex, race, and age variations in arrest probability, suggesting that arrest data may not be an unbiased indicator of criminal behavior and should be used cautiously as a drug treatment outcome measure. Other chapters outline a criminality measure that combines frequency and seriousness dimensions into a single index and recommend a strategy for using criminal behavior indicators in TOPS research. Specific issues considered include measurement techniques, offense typologies, a criminal behavior index, a criminal justice system involvement index, and adapting the Sellin-Wolfgang scoring system to TOPS. Research and policy implications of the report's findings are discussed. Tables, approximately 80 references, and TOPS self-report forms are supplied.