U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Role Conflict and Stress of Prison Guards - Organizational and Cross-National Perspectives (From Comparative Criminology, P 135-155, 1983, Israel L Barak-Glantz and Elmer H Johnson, ed. - See NCJ-92329)

NCJ Number
92337
Author(s)
P Wickman
Date Published
1983
Length
21 pages
Annotation
In this study, data relevant to prison guards' perceptions of their work environment were organized within a model used as a framework for the analysis of the sources (determinants) of stress reactions and role conflict among prison personnel.
Abstract
The model used is based on a body of research findings indicating that work environments have significant impacts on the manner in whch employees function. Data from results of published studies in North America were contrasted with information from several studies of prisons in the Nordic countries as well as some data drawn from the author's interviews with prison staff and inmates. The following work stressors were included in the model as sources of work stress: (1) factors intrinsic to the job task, (2) role in the organization, (3) career development, (4) relations within the organization, (5) organizational structure and climate, and (6) organization interface with the outside environment. The work environment of correctional institutions was found to have significant effects on workers, such that it may be viewed as containing sources of stress and related personal problems. Debilitating factors in the prison work environment include the continuous demand for alertness, a wide social distance between the captives and the keepers, and an often aggravating social isolation. The survey data precluded any assessment of validity or reliability due to the variety of intentions and variables used in the various studies. It is feasible to conclude, however, that stress reactions and role conflict among prison guards cannot be viewed in terms of any single global pattern; i.e., perceptions of guards do not reflect a monolithic profile relative to the determinants included in the model. Further studies focusing on various determinants and levels of stress reaction are in order. The accumulation of such data might more fully test the applicability of the model. Seventy-two references are listed.