U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Profile of Syndicate Corruption in the Police Force (From Corruption and Its Control Hong Kong, 1981, P 199-221, Rance P L Lee, ed. - See NCJ-92737)

NCJ Number
92739
Author(s)
T S Cheung; C C Lau
Date Published
1981
Length
23 pages
Annotation
Distinguishing features of police syndicate corruption in Hong Kong -- when officers receive money from the same account on a regular basis -- include the lack of a political dimension since officials are appointed, its localized nature, and the masterminding of corruption at the middle management level.
Abstract
Data sources for this analysis were newspaper reports, court rulings, interviews with six police officers, and literature on corruption in Hong Kong society. Each of Hong Kong's four police districts are divided into divisions, the most important base for law enforcement operations and the most common location for corruption syndicates. The syndicate had a symbiotic relationship with its clients which fell into two categories: illegal activities such as gambling dens, drug divans, and hawkers and people who were engaged in lawful occupations but committed occasional offenses. All new arrivals to a unit would find money, usually in their lockers, and if they took it agreed to become syndicate members. Control was a paramount concern, but the tight-knit fraternal nature of police officer subculture facilitated this task. Religious practices, coercive measures, and harassment were also used. Europeans generally occupied the upper echelons of the police and relied on staff sergeants to oversee the Chinese rank and file. The critical leaders of syndicate corruption were thus the staff sergeants who also possessed enormous informal power and usually had close connections with the triad societies as well as with their counterparts in other divisions. This situation has changed considerably since the early 1970's when an organizational shakeup curtailed the staff sergeants' powers. The article includes 57 footnotes.

Downloads

No download available

Availability