The juvenile court was initially intended to benefit both juveniles and the public by making provision for juveniles to receive treatment according to their needs, thus preventing their harsh and punitive treatment while correcting their behavior and steering them away from crimes against citizens in the future. This purpose of the juvenile courts was often abused as the courts adopted punitive dispositions with little regard for treatment, while also depriving juveniles of the due process rights afforded by adult courts. Juvenile courts now are required to practice due process procedures similar to those given adult defendants. Still, the juvenile court considers that some juveniles cannot benefit from the treatment, nonpunitive approach of the juvenile system. Such juveniles can be transferred to adult courts under a waiver, making them subject to the punitive sanctions applied to adult criminals. Judicial waiver is the most common method used, yet it is the procedure with the most ambiguity. Punishment of the juvenile in adult courts has also created many problems. Legislators usually draft laws specifying punishments that will fit the proscribed behavior; yet, there is a consensus among the States that capital punishment is too harsh a penalty for a juvenile. Conviction under a juvenile waiver almost always means prison for the offender. The duration and conditions of extended imprisonment for the juvenile offender are determined by each court's interpretation of statutes and circumstances. The appendixes present the various criteria used for waiver in various jurisdictions.