U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Evidentiary Basis for Fingernail Striation Association

NCJ Number
94151
Journal
Journal of Police Science and Administration Volume: 12 Issue: 2 Dated: (June 1984) Pages: 201-206
Author(s)
I C Stone; A Wilimovsky
Date Published
1984
Length
6 pages
Annotation
Since the Federal Rules of Evidence leaves open to the court the decision on whether testimony in relatively new technical methods is admissible, the use of fingernail striation -- the longitudinal ridges formed on human fingernails -- as a means of personal identification may be possible if the expert witness and counsel work to present the evidence appropriately.
Abstract
A 1955 case involving fraud was the first reported use of the individual character of nail striations. A variety of researchers have reported that the parallel striations on the surfaces of the nails are significantly different for each individual and that, if no damage occurs, the striation patterns should not change noticeably during the person's life. In People v. Wesley in 1981, the court of appeals stated, however, that the evidence did not show a recognition and acceptance of technique in the forensic community. However, evidence on fingernails was used in a case in LaCrosse County, Wis. The defendant was charged with first degree murder and first degree sexual assault of a woman in 1981. A scanning electron microscope was used to compare crime scene nails with right thumb nails taken about a year and a half later. Although the defense's expert witness argued that the markings were not sufficiently similar and that the nails differed in the composition of five chemical elements, the prosecution cited research showing that chemical composition differs within a nail and that excessive magnification shows irrelevant minutiae like soil and loose tissue. The defendant was found guilty on both counts, and the case is on appeal. Photographs, a figure, and 15 references are included.

Downloads

No download available

Availability