U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Arbitration in Professional Sports - Baseball and Grievance Arbitration (From Arbitration Promise and Performance, P 179-189, James L Stern and Barbara D Dennis, ed. - See NCJ-94688)

NCJ Number
94695
Author(s)
R M Moss
Date Published
1984
Length
11 pages
Annotation
The impartial grievance arbitration process has been significant in the relatively new relationship between the baseball players' union and management, in the relationship between players and club officials, and in the relationship among the players themselves. Focus is on three cases decided in the early and mid-1970's.
Abstract
An issue arose in the 1971 season involving Alex Johnson, an outfielder with the California Angels, who became defiant and uncooperative on the field and extremely withdrawn off the field. When the club imposed a disciplinary suspension without pay, a grievance was filed by the union, stating that Johnson was obviously suffering from emotional distress and should be treated in the same manner as one who has a physical injury or illness--that is, be placed on the disabled list. The importance of the case, decided in favor of Johnson, was that players and management came to realize it was not a catastrophe. In 1974 another case was perceived by some as an attack on the viability of the game and the business--the dispute between Jim Hunter, one of the brightest and best-paid pitching stars, and Charles O. Finley, the owner, president, and general manager of the Oakland Athletics. This case taught that contract language means what it says. The 1974 decision in the Messersmith case had the effect of ending baseball's reserve system as it was commonly understood. It caused a change in the way teams are assembled, maintained, and improved and resulted in providing winters of activity and publicity for the sport. Its effect on player salaries since 1976 is conservatively estimated at more than a billion dollars.

Downloads

No download available

Availability