U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Interfaces Between the Mental Health and Criminal Justice System - The Legal Perspective (From Mental Health and Criminal Justice, P 21-41, 1984, Linda A Teplin, ed. - See NCJ-96294)

NCJ Number
96295
Author(s)
B A Weiner
Date Published
1984
Length
21 pages
Annotation
This chapter discusses interfaces between mental health professionals and the criminal justice system. These occur when the issues of competency to stand trial and the insanity defense are raised, the defendant is acquitted by reason of insanity, the person is mentally disabled within a correctional institution, and/or diversion into a treatment program is considered during the sentencing process.
Abstract
This discussion considers the legal standards and policy implications related to each of the aforementioned interfaces. Topics considered in discussing competency to stand trial are the role of the mental health professional, disposition of the incompetent defendant, and proposals for change and development. The section on the insanity defense considers the development of the defense, the sanity evaluation, the successful insanity plea, and proposals for change. The status of State laws pertaining to the disposition of the insanity acquittee is then reviewed, followed by an overview of case law and correctional practices regarding mentally disabled inmates. Criminal justice diversion programs which use the services of mental health professionals are reviewed in the concluding section, particularly programs for drug and alcohol abusers. The chapter concludes that although legislation has sought to improve the lot of the mentally disabled offender, there are often only paper achievements unsupported by significant change. It is argued that what is needed are new treatment programs specifically directed to the needs and conditions of the mentally disabled offender. A list of cases and 29 references are provided.