Although most attention focuses on prisoners, three-fourths of all offenders are being supervised in the community. In addition, the pervasive view that nothing works in corrections obscures the fact that treatments sometimes work; the focus should be on learning what works with whom and when. Similar contradictions exist when parole is discussed. Parole and probation supervision practices should include swift and sure sanctions for violations. Selective incapacitation, which is classification based on risk assessment, should be handled fairly. Cultural variables should be counted with the criminal ones when assessing the degree and kinds of treatment and community surveillance required. Sentencing options should be reexamined, with consideration of such sanctions as evening residential alternatives in the community and mandatory day programs. Honesty in sentencing and corrections should be achieved by educating the public about the cycle of childhood victimization and later criminality as well as other factors contributing to criminal behavior. Also, there is a need for more useful research. Legislation and other information related to Washington and Oregon are suplied, as well as a list of 14 references.