Nine steps are described: (l) identifying the parties that have a stake in the outcome; (2) ensuring that each interest group is adequately represented; (3) identifying the key issues and narrowing the agenda points of the conflict; (4) generating a sufficient number of alternatives; (5) agreeing on the boundaries and time horizon for impact assessment; (6) weighing, scaling, and amalgamating judgments about impacts; (7) identifying possible compensatory actions; (8) implementing the bargains that are made; and (9) holding the parties to their commitments. Five case studies are presented that elaborate the problems at each step toward dispute resolution: Storm King Power Plant, Franconia Notch, the Snoqualmie-Snohomish Dam, Cayuga Lake, and White Flint Shopping Mall. Some of the techniques that are most useful in resolving environmental disputes are examined, and the advantages and disadvantages of each are noted. Obstacles to effective intervention and negotiation are explored, and special problems confronting public agencies that seek to resolve environmental disputes are identified. Five illustrations and 120 references (some annotated) are included.