skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 97220 Find in a Library
Title: Crime File: Domestic Violence
Series: NIJ Crime Files
Corporate Author: Police Foundation
United States of America
Date Published: 1985
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20850
Police Foundation
Washington, DC 20036
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 84-IJ-CX-0031
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Audiovisual Sales
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20850
United States of America
Document: PDF (Study Guide)|Video (28:46)
Format: Video (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Using an interview panel format, this videotape, one of the 'Crime File' services, focuses on the findings of an experimental program in Minneapolis, Minn., pertaining to the most effective police method for dealing with domestic assaults.
Abstract: The experiment involved police approaching domestic assaults in one of three ways: mediation, arrest, and requiring the assailant to leave the premises. The study found that the assailants arrested were only half as likely as assailants handled by other methods to repeat their assaults. Recidivism was measured by subsequent interviews with victims and an examination of arrest records. The Minneapolis Police Department now has a policy of arresting alleged assailants if there are visible signs of injury to the victims. Portrayed interviews with some Minneapolis officers indicate their unhappiness with the policy and their desire for greater discretion in their approach to particular incidents. The panel interviewed consists of Lawrence Sherman, University of Maryland, who conducted the experimental study; George Napper, Police Commissioner of Atlanta, Ga.; and Barbara Hart, National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Napper argues for an emphasis on treatment, with police acting as trained referral agents. He challenges the findings of the Minneapolis study, based on the fact that the mediation or treatment approach was ill-defined and probably consisted of little more than some superficial police advice to the assailant. Hart argues for a combination of arrest and treatment, since effective treatment is long term, and court action is required to enforce treatment participation. Hart cites a program in Duluth, Minn., which combines arrests and criminal justice processing with treatment. Participants have not reoffended for 1 year after treatment. Napper notes that the Atlanta police do make arrests when the domestic assault is an apparent felony, i.e., a weapon or severe injury are involved. The panel agrees that further empirical evidence is needed to indicate the effects of particular police policies in dealing with domestic assault.
Index Term(s): Deterrence effectiveness; Domestic assault; Georgia (USA); Minnesota; Police crisis intervention; Police effectiveness; Police policies and procedures; Videotapes
Note: Videocassette (3/4 inch, Beta, and VHS), 28.30 minutes in length, color.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.