U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Psychological Characteristics and Assessment of Aggressive Adolescents (From Aggressive Adolescent, P 17-62, 1984, Charles R Keith, ed. See NCJ-98503)

NCJ Number
98505
Author(s)
J E Lochman
Date Published
1984
Length
46 pages
Annotation
An analysis of the psychological literature dealing with the personality characteristics and findings of the personality characteristics and findings of psychological testing of violent adolescents discusses the prominent psychological mechanisms involved in this behavior and the range and validity of the psychological instruments being used.
Abstract
Because no simple mechanism accounts for all forms of aggressive behavior, the assessment of aggression requires an examination of the context of the behavior as well as the adolescent's unique personality structure, conflicts, and behavioral response styles. The peaking of aggression during early to middle adolescence has been found in much research and appears to relate to the developmental tasks of adjusting to puberty and of furthering their own identity development. The psychological characteristics of aggressive adolescents relate to their cognitive appraisal processes, cognitive impulsivity, problemsolving mechanisms, inhibitory mechanisms, defense mechanisms, and the networks formed among the various cognitive processes. Assessment techniques include projective tests like the Rorschach and thematic apperception tests, general self-report inventories like the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, and specific self-report inventories for aggression and anger. Other assessment techniques include measures of specific cognitive mediating processes and behavioral assessment through rating scales and behavioral research instruments. Psychological assessment is appropriate for some adolescents when used with clinical interviews. Psychological measures should be chosen and interpreted cautiously. The focus should be on the adolescents' distorted appraisal processes, defense mechanisms, defective problemsolving skills, and lack of guilt, empathy, or social perspective-taking. The least valid use of the tests is the prediction of violence. One hundred thirty-six references are listed.

Downloads

No download available

Availability