skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 98920 Find in a Library
Title: Productivity and Resource Allocation in Prosecution and Public Defender Agencies
Author(s): J E Jacoby; E C Ratledge
Corporate Author: Jefferson Institute for Justice Studies
Institute Director
United States of America
Date Published: Unknown
Page Count: 33
Sponsoring Agency: Jefferson Institute for Justice Studies
Washington, DC 20036
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 80-IJ-CX-0032; 82-IJ-CX-0028
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: After discussing the inadequacy of productivity measures for many public delivery systems and issues associated with labor as an input in productivity models, this paper reports on research that measured the amount of prosecutor and public defender effort in processing cases to completion.
Abstract: The research examined three files. The prosecutor's data were collected from the Polk County prosecutor's office in Des Moines, Iowa. Data were based on a 10-percent systematic sample of cases closed between July 1, 1979, and June 30, 1980 (334 cases). Public defender data were obtained from offices in Kentucky and Nebraska, both of which use the National Legal Aid and Defenders Association's AMICUS system for recording attorney effort times. For all three files, time is recorded for an attorney activity as it occurs. Data analysis identified major factors determining attorney effort and productivity in a given case: the dispositional route of the case, the type of offense, the severity of the sanction attached to the case, and the defendant's criminal history. Thus, levels of attorney effort are variable and potentially subject to change, but different levels of productivity (number of cases processed for a given amount of attorney hours) can be achieved by distributing the workload in various ways. Changes in productivity were examined under a 10-percent reduction in trials in Kentucky and Nebraska along with a 10-percent increase in crime in Iowa. Effects of these changes on productivity are calculated. The author notes that the unanswered question is to what extent resources can be redistributed for increased productivity without violating the quality of justice dispensed. Future research is suggested for developing definitions of capacity, efficiency, quality of output, and equity. Twenty-three footnotes as well as tabular and graphic data are provided.
Index Term(s): Cost effectiveness analysis; Iowa; Kentucky; Nebraska; Productivity; Prosecutors; Public defenders
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.