U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Evidence and Trial Advocacy Workshop - Prior Conviction Impeachment; Discretionary Balancing; Dishonesty and False Statement

NCJ Number
99085
Journal
Criminal Law Bulletin Volume: 21 Issue: 4 Dated: (July-August 1985) Pages: 338-352
Author(s)
M H Graham
Date Published
1985
Length
15 pages
Annotation
This study interprets and examines issues in the application of Rule 609(a) and 609(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which pertain to the use of witnesses' prior criminal convictions to impeach their testimony.
Abstract
Rule 609(a) limits the use of prior convictions to impeach witnesses to crimes punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of 1 year, based on the court's determination that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to the defendant. The rule also permits admitting evidence of a witness' prior conviction that involved dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment. The analysis of this section of the rule covers criteria used in the discretionary balancing of the probative and prejudicial aspects of prior conviction evidence. This includes a review of relevant court decisions in Luck v. United States, Gordon v. United States, and United States v. Fountain. The study then reviews which crimes courts have interpreted to involve dishonesty and false statements, thus having a direct relevance to the witnesses' propensity for deceptive behaviors. The study's final section interprets Rule 609(b), which governs admissibility of a prior conviction when more than 10 years have elapsed since the conviction date or the witnesses' release from confinement, whichever is the later date. Twenty-eight footnotes are provided.