U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

School Performance, Containment Theory, and Delinquent Behavior

NCJ Number
99370
Journal
Youth and Society Volume: 17 Issue: 1 Dated: (September 1985) Pages: 69-95
Author(s)
R Lawrence
Date Published
1985
Length
27 pages
Annotation
Data collected from 171 subjects (73 girls, 89 boys) in 4 high schools and 3 juvenile correctional programs in San Antonio, Tex., demonstrates that 50 percent of the variance in delinquent behavior can be explained by school performance and personality factors.
Abstract
The sample represented a cross section of students and correctional programs. The questionnaire used to assess school performance, participation in school activities, and self-reported delinquent behavior was adapted from the Elliot and Voss (1974) study on delinquency and dropouts. The High School Personality Questionnaire was used to measure variables which might contain misbehavior. Regression analysis of self-reported delinquency, school performance, and containment variables revealed significant correlations between school performance factors such as lower grades, more rule violations, truancy, and self-reported delinquency. Delinquents generally were more reserved and detached compared to the more outgoing nondelinquents. The delinquent group scored significantly lower on the intelligence scale. Delinquents were more touch-minded and self-sufficient than the more tender-minded and group-dependent nondelinquents. Thus, both school performance and personality factors served as containments against further misbehavior. Variables that explained 50 percent of the variance in delinquent behavior are examined. The study concludes that delinquent behavior is largely a result of failure in school, and that failure cannot be explained simply by lower ability of some students. Other issues addressed include schools' responses to deviance and strategies to reduce the school failure-delinquency problem. Tables, footnotes, and over 30 references are included.