U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Certainty of Punishment and Sentence Mitigation in Plea Behavior

NCJ Number
99529
Journal
Justice Quarterly Volume: 2 Issue: 3 Dated: (September 1985) Pages: 363-383
Author(s)
B R McCarthy; C A Lindquist
Date Published
1985
Length
21 pages
Annotation
Based on 560 indictments drawn from the Tenth Judicial Circuit in Jefferson County, Ala., during 1977-79, this examination of the relationship between plea bargaining behavior and sentencing benefits failed to support the common assumption that mitigation of sentence severity is a primary factor underlying defendant decisions to plead guilty.
Abstract
The sample of 560 indictments led to 453 convictions. It contained 140 murder indictments (112 convictions), 54 rape indictments (33 convictions), 70 aggravated assault indictments (48 convictions), and 296 robbery indictments (260 convictions). Of these defendants, 43 percent pleaded not guilty and of those persons, 43 percent avoided conviction. Type of plea, however, varied considerably by offense charged. For example, robbery defendants were most likely to plead guilty and murder defendants least likely to offer a guilty plea. Rape and assault defendants appeared to achieve the greatest benefits by refraining from guilty pleas. Regarding assault, it is interesting to note that a plea of not guilty was resolved by a decision not to prosecute in over one-third of the cases. Some defendants, notably robbers, frequently plead guilty in the relative absence of significant benefits. Others, notably alleged murderers, plead not guilty even though significant benefits are available for guilty pleaders. Tables, 7 footnotes, and over 40 references are provided.

Downloads

No download available

Availability