U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Case Against Sentencing 15-Year-Olds to Prison Service Custody

NCJ Number
140736
Date Published
1992
Length
4 pages
Annotation
This paper argues that the British Government should remove 15-year-olds from Prison Service custody and place them instead in local authority secure units.
Abstract
Bullying and intimidation occur in many young offender institutions and are often factors in suicide attempts. Other effects of locking up children as young as 15 years in penal facilities include the following: (1) large catchment areas of young offender institutions mean that young people are often held far from their home areas, making visits by families and social workers difficult; (2) in some young offender institutions, restricted regimes mean that young people may be locked in their cells for long periods; (3) young people aged 15 years learn about criminal techniques from older and more experienced prisoners; and (4) prison staff do not have the necessary training or resources to provide appropriate care for prisoners as young as 15 years. In 1990, 484 offenders aged 15 years were sent to detention in young offender institutions; three out of four people under 17 years of age were reconvicted within 2 years after release. Because of this high recidivism rate, the paper contends that local authority secure units are more appropriate for 15-year-olds than Prison Service custody. These units have a better physical environment and staff qualified to work with difficult and vulnerable youth. Where 15-year-olds have committed less serious offenses, far more will be achieved by requiring them to participate in constructive community sentences than by sending them to detention for short periods. Noncustodial options include fines, compensation orders, attendance center orders, supervision orders, and intensive intermediate treatment.